PhysiqueNerd
Welcome in · your assessment, reconciled

Your body, from three sources

They don’t agree — they never do. Here’s each one, what we found inside it, and which number your plan will actually trust.

Tanita MC-780 report device-estimated
22.0%

⚠ Your report disagrees with itself. It printed 176.4 lb weight and 44.1 lb fat mass — but 44.1 ÷ 176.4 = 25.0%, not the printed 22.0%. We use the arithmetic, not the print.

Your tape — 4 sites your measurement
27–30%

US Navy formula from your neck, abdomen and height. Honest error: about ±3 points.

Your belief stated
“~18%”

Not dismissed — tested. See the open test on the right.

Muscle mass device-estimated
132.4 lb

From your Tanita. When there’s no device, this comes from your frame model — and improves as our calibration data grows. Estimator v1.0 — every number keeps its version.

OUR WORKING ESTIMATE
25–29% body fat
1520253035

A range, because that’s what the evidence honestly supports. Six weeks of trend data will narrow it. A single decimal would be a guess wearing a lab coat.

Test opened: you say ~18% — your measurements say 25–29%
WINDOW · 6 WEEKSSIGNAL · WAIST + WEIGHT TREND + STRENGTHCLOSES · SEP 19

If your data lands you leaner than we estimated, the record will say you were right — and the plan recalculates around it.

YOUR FRAMEfrom today’s tape Your frame model

Your frame model — rebuilt every time you re-measure. See it on your profile →

Build my plan →
Why should I trust your range over my Tanita?
Don’t trust either blindly — that’s the point. Your Tanita’s own numbers contradict its printed percentage, which tells us its software rounds carelessly. The range holds everything that survived checking, and your six-week trend will shrink it. Trust what survives arithmetic.
Every number traces to a source and a rule · nothing here is vibes